Categories
self-publishing the descendant

The self-publishing experiment part 3: Designing the experiment

Good old ALCS. Thanks for the bootstrap finance!

Question: How much work does it take to write a self-published book?
Answer: about as much as for a traditionally published books

The first part of any experiment, and in many ways the most enjoyable part, is the experimental design.

I love to design experiments. It’s the beautiful phase, where everything is theoretical, and in your head, everything works. That’s some time before you spill radioactive isotopes in the water bath and incur the wrath of the entire lab.

Even executing the experiment isn’t too bad. It’s the eventual failure of most of them that makes science so hard. Starting out, you know that the experiment will almost certainly fail; either at the pathetic stage of not actually working, because you need better reagents, or at the heart-breaking stage where it worked, but the answer was NO.

No, that is not how I, Nature work. Try again. Or give up. Who cares, puny scientist? For lo, I am Nature.

Remember that – the answer is very often NO. If you can fully accept this setting out and still work hard, stay positive and concentrate on all the details, then you have much of what it takes to be a scientist.

The experimental question is this:

Can a modestly successful, internationally-published author (but not a ‘household name’), produce a quality product that will engage existing and new readers and make the author more money than if the manuscript had been sold for a modest advance?

(N.B. It’s important to stress that whatever the results of the experiment, certain extrapolations will always be invalid. Failure won’t mean that all self-published authors will fail. Success won’t mean the end of traditional publishing. Success/failure can’t even be successfully applied to MY next project. Once in a while an author has a runaway success. More frequently we provide a regular drip of content, slowly building an audience. I’m guessing that I’ll be in the latter category. This isn’t pessimism, just an acknowledgement of the balance of probabilities.)

Let’s say that I might have been able to get £5k for this manuscript. (Given that THE DESCENDANT is an adult novel set in the world of a YA book series, a sale would have been impossible via my own publisher, since Scholastic only publish children’s books, but let’s just use £5k as a representative advance).

My ALCS & PLR fund is about £2,000 this year. I’m a strong believer in bootstrap finance for start-ups, so this means I can use this as surplus profit from The Joshua Files to be invested in my imprint.

£2,000 is the total cash budget. So the book needs to make £7,000 for me to break-even including an opportunity cost*. (but only £2K to recoup the cash.)

Designing this self-publishing experiment, I asked myself a few questions:

  1. Which formats should I produce? ebook only? Enrol in Kindle Select? Make a print version too? POD or short-run offset print?
  2. Availability of any print edition – make available for sale in the UK and US? Or just one of the two?
  3. What kind of revenue model are we looking at? How many copies need to sell at what price to recoup the cash investment?
  4. Marketing – how much to spend and how?

The one thing I never had to consider was this – would I hire an editor.

OF COURSE. No question. Not only that but I’d substantially rewrite the original manuscript, which was the first thing I’d written since my days of Blake’s 7 fan fiction. The manuscript couldn’t be structurally edited too severely, because the Joshua Files mythology and the details of the Alternate Reality Game rest on many elements in THE DESCENDANT.

But edited as much as the manuscript could take? Hell, yeah! The first thing I did was to spend six weeks rewriting the 2005-version of the script.

My accomplice in this was, I’m delighted to say,  the experienced senior children’s book editor, Polly Nolan. Polly and I worked together on ZERO MOMENT and DARK PARALLEL while Polly was Editorial Director of Fiction at Scholastic Children’s Books, UK. When I told Polly my plan to publish THE DESCENDANT, she was incredibly supportive and agreed to take the project on. I couldn’t quite afford the three rounds of editing I’d had with all the Joshua Files books, but I knew Polly well enough to know that if the manuscript isn’t too structurally flawed, she can do most of the job in one round.

Imagine my relief when Polly declared that the manuscript ‘didn’t need too much work, structurally’. (Another nice comment was “I’m enjoying very much.  I can tell it’s one of your early books, but that doesn’t mar my enjoyment of it.” See how lovely it can be to have an editor?)

I had to do my own proof-read. Not ideal, but here’s a tip – use a Kindle and make the font really large. Mistooks juts lep out.

All in all, the actual creation of a manuscript that I felt able to publish took the following: 9 weeks (first draft – intense writing whilst recovering from a broken leg) + 6 weeks rewrite + 3 weeks editing + 1 week typesetting (Amazon help a good deal with hand-holding an author through this). Plus Polly’s fee.

Total time of mine? 19 weeks. ICE SHOCK took less (about 13 weeks) and APOCALYPSE MOON  took more (about 21 weeks).

THE DESCENDANT, at approx 90,000 words, therefore represents a similar authorial effort from me as one of my Joshua Files books.

Next: Design and Decisions: In which I ponder formats (print? ebook? US/UK?)

*:
For pesky business pedants; yes I admit that the opportunity cost is arguably higher. I could have used that time to write another bestseller, or even this book, with a traditional publisher, might have sold more. But creating ‘entertainment products’ is a very unsure thing. No-one knows what will be a hit or not. Nicholas Nassim Taleb correctly identified best-sellers as ‘black swan’ events.

Categories
self-publishing

The self-publishing experiment part 2: Barriers to entry

Barriers to entry by Aaron Hockley

Let’s talk about barriers to entry.

When you’re trying to build a competitive business, you want to build a barrier to entry that’s as high as possible. This stops any old Jonny-come-lately competing with you. Traditional publishers have had a long time to build that barrier. Here’s what they have:

  1. Editorial staff – they have the best. After university, when I became a scientist and then started an IT business, I wondered what had happened to all those brilliant English Lit students. I never came across them in science, healthcare or business. They’d simply vanished! Then I became a published author, working with brilliant editors like Elv Moody, Polly Nolan, Clare Argar and Jessica White at Scholastic Children’s Books UK. Suddenly the answer to ‘what did you study at university’ was invariably ‘English’.
    The best and brightest English Lit. graduates often aspire to work in publishing. They get paid in sixpences and have to work in That London. And still, it’s devilish hard to find a good job. You’d better believe that traditional publishers employ the best editors you will ever meet.
    What you could do: However, some great editors have been laid off. Many now work freelance. You can find them via various literary consultancies. There’s never enough money in publishing – your coin will be as good as anyone’s.
  2. Designers – Similarly, some terrific artists work in publishing. Book jacket design is a real skill. However, there are plenty of freelance graphic designers, too.
  3. Supplier relationships. Traditional publishers know who are the best printers, they have contracts with the distributors, warehousing, etc.
    What you could do. I checked the website of Bookmarque, the printers who print Joshua Files. They’ll print short runs (say, 1000 copies) of offset-printed books and deal with indie publishers. They can hook you up with a warehousing-distribution supplier to handle fulfilment. Even Scholastic Children’s Books now use Harper Collins for fulfilment.
  4. Bookseller relationships. When I was first published, SCB took me to the Galaxy Book Awards, specifically so that I could meet the key buyers of children’s books from WHSmith, Waterstones, Gardners and Borders. It was quite a revelation to realise that the key decisions in children’s books were made by a small handful of people. Publishers have those relationships. You don’t. It’s theoretically possible that I myself could work the phone to persuade Sainsbury’s to buy my next book directly from me. But I’m putting all my eggs in the online retail market. You have to draw the line somewhere, or hire a salesperson.
  5. Opinion-former relationships: Excellent relationships with critics and the key opinion-formers in fiction have a lot to do with books getting good reviews. It’s not that critics are having their arm twisted. It’s simply that if you are my friend, you are more likely to look kindly on a book that is close to my heart, in which my employer has invested major moolah, and you may be less likely to point out any hideous flaws. Friends are inclined to be nice to their friends. Publishers take pains to be nice to opinion-formers, invite them to dinners, conferences, etc. This is simply good business practice. It’s not ever going to reach the levels of charm-offensive as the pharmaceutical industry schmoozing doctors at sales conferences in Cancun. But it’s on the same continuum.
    What you could do: Not much. If your book is truly brilliant (e.g. you are Junot Diaz, Mario Vargas Llosa, etc) and you persuade a critic to review it, you may get a good review.  You can pay for a Kirkus Review, if you have a strong nerve. Kirkus Reviewers are famously brutal. (A Kirkus reviewer disliked Invisible City but was rather more favourably impressed with Ice Shock.)
  6. Media contacts: We live in an age that values the written word less than ever before. No sense throwing your hands up in disgust about how society is going to hell in a handcart. Computer games and YouTube and social networking were not available in Dickens’s time, there was little enough entertainment that his sometimes intractable and always colourful tales were blockbusters. When I was at high school I used to scribble bawdy Blake’s 7 scripts in the central pages of my maths books, rip them out and pass them round my classmates, who were always demanding more. Intelligent people, when bored, will read almost anything. Nowadays they can just check out their friends on Facebook.Therefore, it’s not easy to get the attention of media for a books. There are channels, including specialist TV and radio shows. But they preach to the converted. Harry Potter didn’t get huge by preaching to the choir – the story of a children’s book selling 30,00 copies burst onto the mainstream media. (When Invisible City sold 40,000 in the first four months, the media reaction was a big, fat meh.) By the time Twilight went mainstream in the US it had already sold around a million copies. The bar is higher now.
    What you could do: Publishers employ dedicated publicists to get their authors media coverage. If you want media coverage, you need to, too. Not cheap, but this is where you might want to put your third thousand pounds. Don’t expect magic, but if you are a nobody (not already a household name) this will level the playing field against traditionally-published nobodies, i.e., most fiction authors.
  7. Literary festivals: It’s not clear how many copies are shifted as a result of an appearance at a literary festival. Unless you are already a Name, you’re unlikely to garner any publicity from the appearance. Publishers are probably quietly on the fence about whether they should continue to throw budget at sending authors to Edinburgh, Hay, etc. However, I was surprised to hear that it’s not just up to the publisher whether an author is invited to a literary festival. My friend Professor Paul Broda, a molecular biologist who published a beautiful volume of biography about his parents being Soviet spies (Scientist Spies), told me that anyone could apply to go to most literary festivals, and he was planning on doing just that.
    What you could do: Like Paul, you could apply to the literary festivals to appear on their programme. The fee (usually around £150) would probably cover your travel expenses.
  8. Foreign Rights: Publishers and agents have the foreign rights marketplace sewn up. They have relationships with dozens of foreign language publishers and party with them at trade fairs in London, Frankfurt and Bologna. Many a book advance is actually paid for by the sales of foreign rights, sometimes to publishers who themselves fail to recoup the advances. So long as your originating publisher makes money, you will probably continue to have a good relationship with your publisher. Business is all about relationships and those with people who lives thousands of miles away take careful nurturing. A self-publisher can rule out foreign rights sales, unless their book hits it big, which is unlikely.
    What you could do: If you’re feeling very energetic, you could try getting in as an indie-publisher to the International Rights section of a major book trade fair and hustling 40 publishers over two days. This is well beyond most authors I know. Even some agents prefer not to engage and leave the foreign rights sales to the originating publisher.  Your best bet here is to have a literary agent who handles foreign sales, doesn’t mind you self-publishing a book they might have sold and agrees to handle your foreign rights. You can find them in the telephone book next to the Tooth Fairy. (actually, seriously, I can see literary agents increasingly agreeing to do this.)

As a self-publisher you will probably be looking at accessing only about 30% of the retail market (i.e. the online sector). You won’t see much media coverage (neither do most traditionally-published authors). Like all but the front-list authors, you won’t be invited to dinners, conferences or literary festivals unless you work the phone very hard. You won’t meet the opinion-formers and if you do, you will be a self-pubbed author, ewww. (‘Not that there’s anything wrong with that’ is not yet politically de rigeur in publishing.)

Good luck if you’re prepared to try all this, but like hiring a sales force, I draw the line at much of this. I prefer to work the 30% online retail sector hard and use aggressive pricing, like million-selling self-publisher John Locke.

Access to 30% of the paperback retail outlets, 100% of the digital outlets, your own marketing efforts and the opinions of ‘ordinary’ readers (i.e. not critics) are all you have. However, you get to keep 35% royalties as opposed to 7.5%. So you have to sell five times fewer* copies to make the same as you would from sales of a traditionally published book.

Even five-times fewer will be difficult, without the boost of proper marketing. That’s why you need to do some.

Next: Designing the experiment: ebook only? Or dare you print, too? If you have established readership, you may have to.

*:

Hello, business pedants.  Yes, I know that five-times is a guesstimate. That compares the lower Amazon royalty to the MMP royalty. But on ebook a publisher may give you 20%. However, you might choose the 70% royalty option at Amazon (if you choose to retail at over $2.00) So overall I’m averaging it out to five-times.

Categories
ARG self-publishing the descendant

The Self-Publishing Experiment part 1

Gareth Stranks's early design drafts for THE DESCENDANT

It seems that for the past six months, all anyone in publishing is talking about is ‘self’ or self-owned-‘indie’ publishing. A few successfully self-published authors are being signed up by traditional publishers. The self-published best-seller Joe Konrath writes a damning indictment of the industry: Do Legacy Publishers Treat Authors Badly? JK Rowling sets up a publishing venture (Pottermore) to promote and sell digital versions of Harry Potter (clever, clever agent for holding on to those rights!). Household-names like Jackie Collins and GP Taylor are self-publishing.

Mega-successful children’s author and screenwriter, Anthony Horowitz, wonders aloud “Do we still need publishers?” and delivers a paean to the tradition of publishing, which also manages to be a stinging rebuke. His comments have some agents and authors on the twittersphere tut-tutting and using the word ‘arrogance’, whilst others quietly retweet and admire the frankness and cojones of an author who has both benefited from having a traditional publisher whilst also making them many times the money he ever earned. If what Anthony Horowitz says is true, then only someone very successful could dare to say it.

Self-publishers document their process and sell how-to books on Kindle. Hundreds of thousands of blog words are devoted to asking theoretical questions: how might the new world of publishing look? Will there be any pie left over after Amazon take their piece?

About fifty per cent of the authors I’ve chatted to in the past few months are thinking of dipping a toe into the self-published waters. Why? Partly it’s down to falling advances and marketing budgets. This means that some manuscripts are being bought for less than an author can afford to write for and will be lightly-marketed, so may be unlikely to sell beyond the advance.

To some, that might give the perception that authors may as well invest their own cash into publishing the manuscript and reap all the potential profits.

Partly too, there is the attraction of the new.

Whoever called e-book publishing a ‘bubble’ is right in one sense; it’s something that a LOT of people are going to want to try. If/when the majority discover that it’s difficult, time-consuming, and elicits too little money; that’s when the bubble might burst.

Most traditionally-published authors I know will probably not try the exercise whilst we’re still in the experimental, bubble-type phase. It’s risky, there’s a cash cost and a substantial opportunity cost to doing the job properly; i.e. treating the manuscript exactly as you might a traditionally published book.

Like most, I would not have thought of trying anything in this phase of the publishing revolution.

But it happens that The Joshua Files is coming to a final chapter, in the UK at least. The books have earned  me some unexpected foreign rights royalties and income from Public Lending Rights and Authors Licensing and Copyright Service, which could be spent on bootstrap investment for a new imprint, owned by my husband and I.

Like many authors who do a huge amount of their own marketing and publicity, I’m extremely curious to know if I can marshal the necessary skills and expertise to execute the whole project. Mr. Harris and I have also started and run a successful technology business (The Oxford Knowledge Company).

Most of all though – I have a spare Joshua Files-related manuscript, first written in 2005 for an adult readership.

THE DESCENDANT has already formed part of the back-story of The Joshua Files. The novel was the basis for the 2009 Alternate Reality Game used to promote ICE SHOCK. It’s unlikely that any publisher the book would publish as fast as I’d like; i.e. roughly around the same time as APOCALYPSE MOON.

You can only dangle so much speculation and theorization in front of a scientist before they’ll rush to the lab to try the experiment.

And dammit – I’m a scientist!

So over the next few weeks I’ll be sharing the details of the experiment, just like a scientific paper. Materials & Methods, Results and Conclusions.

Next: Self-publishing and the barriers to entry, or Why publishers are good at publishing and you are not, and what you can do to narrow the gap.

 

Categories
self-publishing

Yet more (pointless?) predictions about the future of publishing

Crystal BallThey’re everywhere, these days, pointless predictions about the future of publishing. Pointless because the reality of the future will be dictated by a technology that no-one has yet foreseen, far less anyone in publishing. Why not anyone in publishing? Well, mainly for one reason.  And it isn’t that publishing is full of nitwits (because it is not.)

The publishing industry is based on a business model that may well be out-dated – the scarcity model. (Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Agatha Christie and Junot Diaz and assorted literary masters, etc have few equals on the planet, therefore those who control access to their works – publishers – control the market).

It is not this factor per se, which makes it unlikely that a technological innovation is coming from within this community.

It’s that when your business gives you a particular mindset, developing anything that depends on having a radically different one is nigh on impossible. 

I used to work in the information business. (Here’s a paper I gave at ONLINE 1998.) There were conferences galore with sessions about the future of the information business.

Ha. No-one got it right. Some kind of inter-library global information network was the future. Then it was CD-ROMs. Then it was the Internet and paid access to private databases. Then it was intelligent agents.

Here’s what I rarely heard about: ebooks, e-readers, tablets, apps, social networking. And this was only TEN years ago.

For this reason, take a massive pinch of salt before you believe anything that anyone predicts about the future of publishing. This is an industry which did not invent or finance the development of the Internet, Facebook, the first apps or the first e-reader. (Amazon is a new player in publishing. They are fundamentally a technology and logistics company.) Massive mistakes have been made by HUGE decision-makers. I present m’learned friends with the example of Rupert Murdoch, he of media mogulness. I point at the glaring errors of his purchase and subsequent development of Pointcast and MySpace.

That said, I’ll have a go at this game myself. Why not? (Sam Missingham @samatlounge recently tweeted “If I had a penny for every ‘the future of publishing’ article ever written, I’d be coining it in.” Sorry Sam, here’s another and still no coin.)

I too haven’t ever personally developed any innovative information technology and I work in publishing, which makes me brilliantly qualified to gaze into my own crystal ball.

  1. The number of self-published novels is going to soar. This sector within the industry, leaner in costs than any publisher can hope to be, is already providing significant competition. When (to date) over 140 authors have sold over 50,000 ebooks, that is major. It begins to chew rather convincingly into the midlist. Therefore…
  2. The midlist will go. (You don’t say, MG.) Yes, it’s been said before, by Seth Godin and other soothsayers of the publishing tribe. This is no longer soothsaying. It’s happening. The word on the street, in the coffee bars where authors meet, is that advances are lower; in many cases so low that the author can’t afford to keep writing for a living. This is basically the midlist author being told to kindly go away.
    (Btw I have no problem with this at all. It is basic business sense. As Nicola Morgan reminds us, publishers are in it to make money. Enough money to pay their salaries. We all have to make a living. Nothing wrong with making a living selling rewritten fan fiction, Pulitzer prize winning fiction and celebrity memoirs, if that is what people want to read.)
  3. The midlist will migrate to self-publishing, or as I believe it may soon be called, micro-publishing.  Sales of 10,000 copies (a respectable midlist sales level for the UK territory) could realistically translate to a gross income of $10,000. In this sector, the overheads will be stripped to the bone.
    1. The intellectual property – i.e. the content – will be free. This is the authors stake in the business.
    2. Editing will be by freelance editors, perhaps even cooperatives of authors working for credits within the organisation, to trade against having their own work edited.
    3. Jacket design will also be via freelancers. Hurray for this, because the graphic designers have often had a rum deal by their agencies. They already rely on freelance work. Some co-ops/micro-publishers may even retain freelance designers.
    4. Marketing will be left to the author. It practically is anyway, to which traditionally-published author after author will attest.
  4. Print won’t go away. Many people love a paper book. Createspace may well take over the entire micro or self-publishing sector for print. As a recent user of their service I have been blown away by the ease and efficiency of this service. The minute that CS set up in the UK and Australia, their main competitor, Lightning Source, may have to forget about the self/micro-publishing sector and concentrate on printing books for traditional publishing. Createspace  and Lightning Source allow authors to print and distribute books at a price which both competes with traditionally-published books in the marketplace, and give the author slightly more royalty than they’d get via a standard book deal.
  5. Traditional publishers will have to spend ever more on marketing, to compete with the self-published books, which in electronic version at least will be substantially cheaper. An increasing number of books in this sector will be authored by the very authors they developed and then discarded. At that moment, the self/micro publishing sector will no longer imply ‘amateurish’ but ‘books by authors who typically sell fewer than 10,000 copies, but could be very good indeed’.
  6. These bigger marketing budgets will force traditionally-published authors to be instant hits. The debut author will begin to feel like a football player taking a series of penalties at a high-stakes game, having to score a goal with every shot, or risk elimination from the game.
  7. The guaranteed big-hitting authors will realize how profits from their sales are increasingly being used to subsidize the development of new talent which can have only one role to the business – to usurp them. What will they do? First they’ll have their agents hike up their percentage royalties. If your books are making millions, you might feel that a bit more than 10% of that should come your way.
  8. The swollen mid-list will be joined each year by those eliminated from the latest round of penalty kicks. They’ll have homes (micro-publishers) to go to and fans to read their books. Yet more competition. By now, consumers may hesitate to may more than $3 for a ebook, especially since more and more of their favourite authors are available in this form and at this price.
  9. At some stage, traditional publishers will start to introduce more onerous (e.g. post publication) non-compete clauses into their contracts, to stop an author walking away and becoming the competition. Agents may well collude, because otherwise they too will see their own share of the royalty walk away.
  10. At this point any debut author has entered a truly high-stakes game, where they literally bet their future on the publisher’s promise to make them a hit. But debut authors are often relatively naive, having spent most of their time and energy learning how to write a great book. They probably won’t be able to make an honest assessment of the likelihood of those promises being kept.
  11. Some debut authors will be badly burned and may lash out. Their stories may put other authors off trying the traditional publishing route. The burn-rate would have to be bad and the lashing out vehement, because the need for the kind of validation which a traditionally-published book can provide is strong.
  12. Debut authors who enter via self-publishing, on the other hand, will be posting self-publishing success stories, or nothing at all. Since expectations are so low, there won’t be many bitter, angry burn-outs.
    This may make self-publishing the most attractive route for new authors. A publishing professional said to me recently ‘I don’t know why new authors bother with agents or publishers now’. (major aside – Mind you, the elderly Sir Edward Abrahams, the multi-millionaire developer of the cephalosporin class of antibiotics, once told me that he couldn’t see why young people did PhDs any more, since science had become such a rubbish career. And people are still enrolling in PhD programs. Sometimes folk become disillusioned. Doesn’t mean it is over for everyone.)
  13. The new route to traditional fiction publishing could be this: you self-publish a book, it sells well and gains critical acclaim on Goodreads or Amazon. At this point you approach an agent or possibly, they approach you (as happened to Amanda Hocking and EL James). Or conceivably, the micro-publisher itself starts to act as an agent, directly selling rights to foreign publishers and traditional publishers who promise to big up their author’s books.
  14. Unless you are celebrity, in which case, you can write what you like and it will be published. Regular Jo authors shouldn’t envy celebrities this – these people have done whatever it is they have done to become famous, now they are reaping the fringe benefits. If this is the route you desire, then become a movie star or pop star. No point griping that some folk want to read what Justin Bieber has to say rather than what you have to say.
  15. The slush pile will vanish, the midlist will vanish, and fewer books will be traditionally published, but those which are will receive greater marketing funds
  16. Advances will go but royalties will increase.
  17. If Dan Brown, John Grisham, JK Rowling, Lee Child and all the other multi-million selling authors each decide to hire their own editor, publicist and sales person, and start selling their books at a price which would compete with the new, cheaper midlist books, then the big publishers may well collapse. If I worked for their publishers I would be instructing the levels of loveliness around such authors to go up by a significant notch.

There are probably some readers laughing and thinking, tell me something I don’t already know, genius.

Because this is already happening. In 2011, the high profile debuts were “The Emerald Atlas” and “The Midnight Circus” – two manuscripts that were discovered and sold by agents. (Well maybe not the former, which was written by the screenwriter of a top TV show, but basically, it was the usual route.)

In 2012, the high-profile publishing ‘debuts’ had already sold millions – as self-published ebooks by authors Amanda Hocking and E.L. James.

Yes, we can tell ourselves that this is temporary, that once the novelty of a self-published book being successful wears off, the media will stop writing articles about them.

But that belies a fundamental truth about what how media of any kind succeeds – people like to read/watch that which lots of other people read or watch. It doesn’t matter if what everybody reads or watches is not of the highest quality available. What people crave is a shared experience.

Amanda Hocking and E.L James demonstrated that you don’t need a costly marketing campaign to sell a million ebooks. Of course, a costly marketing campaign helps. But there isn’t going to be cash for every book to be heavily marketed. And crucially – many of these costly campaigns are going to fail.

Well, hey. Remember what I said at the top of this post. I am a mere author. I’ve been part of the publishing industry for less than five years. The track record predicts that I can’t predict anything.